WHEN DISABLED CHILDREN, AND ADULTS, ARE MOCKED AND HUMILIATED OVER A DISABILITY, MAKING A SLUR OF THEM, IT VIOLATES FEDERAL LAWS. THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT WAS INSTILLED INTO LAW TO PROTECT THE DISABLED.

THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT WAS PASSED DUE TO HARASSMENT OF THE DISABLED. IT IS SO VAST THAT DISABILITIES ARE MOCKED, THOSE WITH THEM HUMILIATED AND MADE THE OUTCAST, THAT FEDERAL LAWS ON DISCLOSURE, AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT WITH
PROTECTED CLASS STATUS," WAS GIVEN TO ENSURE THE END OF THEIR ILL TREATMENT. TO THIS DAY, WE HAVE THOSE UNETHICAL "RED NECK" TYPES SUCH AS BILL MAYER THAT ATTACK THE DISABLED, EVEN DISABLED DEFENSELESS CHILDREN, AS HE DID MOCKING THE PALIN FAMILY AND THEIR DISABLED CHILD. IT IS A SLUR TO BE CALLED "NUTS," "MENTALLY ILL," "R" WORD, AND IT IS IT PLAIN TO SEE THAT THIS IS DERIVED FROM THE DISRESPECT THEY GIVE THE DISABLED. HOW WOULD THEY FEEL IF THEY WERE MADE A SLUR.
CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS POLITICAL NEWSLETTER BIBLE PROPHECY TIMES EDITION

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bristolpalin/2013/11/whats-up-with-the-new-york-times-ethicist-using-the-r-word-as-an-insult/#disqus_thread

What’s Up with the New York Times’ Ethicist Using the R-Word as an Insult?

www.patheos.com

Amy Julia Becker has a great article about something that happened in the New York Times recently. Last week, Kari Wagner-Peck wrote,