MOZILLA VIOLATES RELIGIOUS LIBERTIES, 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, CORE VALUES, CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS. "I'LL SUE, ON A LEGAL NOTE, BY CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS," ADDED TO YOUTUBE PLAYLIST "CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS POLITICAL NEWSLETTER BIBLE PROPHECY TIMES EDITION UPDATES"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBSqi1sKObE&index=2&list=PLRxsMy-rzJoXdQpluYCJGjTjIIHcmEymy


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBSqi1sKObE&list=PLRxsMy-rzJoXdQpluYCJGjTjIIHcmEymy&feature=share


CEO OF MOZILLA BULLIED INTO RESIGNING AFTER HE DONATED TO AN ORGANIZATION SUPPORTING THE CHRISTIAN DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE:   

MOZILLA VIOLATES 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, AND FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULING GIVING CHRISTIANS THE "LEGAL RIGHTS TO ADHERE TO CORE VALUES," CHRISTIANS DO NOT LOOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE ON THE JOB


BRENDAN EICH DONATED $1,000 DOLLARS TO A GROUP SUPPORTING THE BIBLICAL DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE, WHICH IS ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN, OPPOSING PROPOSITION 8. THEN HE SUFFERED DISCRIMINATION WHEN THE COMPANY SENT OUT MESSAGES DEMONIZING HIM FOR HIS BELIEF IN ROMANS CHAP. 1, BULLYING HIM INTO RESIGNING.


THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT MAINTAINS THAT ONE DOES NOT LOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHEN THEY GO ONTO THEIR JOBS, NOR IN THEIR BUSINESSES, AND THE FED SUPREME COURT RULINGS OF OUR "LEGAL RIGHTS TO ADHERE TO CORE VALUES."  


MOZILLA IS VIOLATED THEIR CEO'S CHRISTIAN CIVIL RIGHTS DEMONIZING THEIR EMPLOYEE FOR HIS CHRISTIAN TENETS OF FAITH, THAT OF ROMANS CHAP 1., AND THE DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE BEING BETWEEN ONE MAN, AND ONE WOMAN. THE CEO HAS A LEGAL RIGHT TO "ADHERE TO CORE VALUES," AND IS SUPPORTED BY THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 

[ violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 ]



THE MESSAGE SENT OUT BY THE COMPANY THAT THE CEO BRENDAN EICH WORKED FOR ATTEMPTED TO DEMONIZE HIS RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AS ANTI-GAY, FOR HIS BELIEFS IN THE BIBLE'S VIEWPOINT OF HOMOSEXUAILTY BEING SIN, AND HIS SUPPORT OF THE BIBLICAL DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE BEING LAW. THIS VIOLATES EICH'S CHRISTIAN CIVIL RIGHTS, AS HIS EMPLOYER CAN NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HIS TENET OF FAITH, THAT OF ROMANS CHAP 1., OR ANY BIBLICAL BELIEFS. 


CHRISTIANS DO NOT LOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS, THEIR LEGAL RIGHT TO "ADHERE TO CORE VALUES," SUCH AS ROMANS CHAPTER 1, OR ANY BIBLICAL BELIEF, WHILE ON THE JOB, OR IN THEIR BUSINESSES.  THIS FEDERAL SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT HAS BEEN SET, SUPPORTING CHRISTIAN CIVIL RIGHTS.  THE "CORE VALUES" RULING SUPPORTED THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 

[Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 ]


THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT OVERTURNED THE "HATE SPEECH," LAWS THAT CENSORED BIBLICAL SCRIPTURES ON HOMOSEXAULITY, AND UPHELD THE CHRISTIAN'S "LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," 

SUPPORTING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS OF CHRISTIANS, 

AND THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS TO ADHERE TO CORE VALUES OF ROMANS CHAP.1, AS THE HATE SPEECH LAWS VIOLATED SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IN ILLEGAL RELIGIOUS CENSORSHIP.  WE DO NOT PREACH A CENSORED BIBLE, AND HAVE THE FULL LEGAL RIGHT TO PREACH, TEACH, ADHERE TO, AND SUPPORT, THE CHRISTIAN VIEWPOINTS.


DEMOCRATS ONLY WANTED FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS FOR THOSE SUPPORTING THEIR VIEWS, BUT OUR LAWS SUPPORT THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF THOSE FROM BOTH ENDS OF THE POLITICAL, AND RELIGIOUS, SPECTRUMS, WITHOUT CENSORSHIP!  

IT IS FREEDOM STRAIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD, INCLUDING THE FREEDOM FOR CHRISTIANS.  IT IS THE LEGAL RIGHTS TO OPPOSE MAINSTREAM THOUGHT.THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DISAGREE, ARGUE, AND DEBATE, ISSUES, AND TO ADHERE TO BIBLICAL MORAL STANDARDS. 


ONE'S EMPLOYER CAN NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ONE'S RELIGIOUS TENETS OF FAITH. THEY CAN NOT HARASS THEIR EMPLOYEES OVER THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON ANY ISSUE, NOR DEMONIZE THEM TO OTHERS FOR SAID BELIEFS.  THIS INCLUDES ROMANS CHAP. 1, WHICH REFERS TO HOMOSEXUALITY AS A SINFUL LIFESTYLE, THAT OF A REPROBATE MIND.  RELIGION IS A "PROTECTED CLASS" UNDER THE LAW, AND IT IS ILLEGAL TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST EMPLOYEES DUE TO RELIGIOUS FAITH. 


EVEN IF OTHERS FIND THE EMPLOYEE'S CHRISTIAN FAITH OFFENSIVE, THEY CAN NOT CENSOR THE EMPLOYEE ON RELIGIOUS ISSUES, NOR CAN DISCRIMINATE. 

THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT DID ***NOT*** FIND A FREEDOM FROM RELIGION, SO THOSE THAT OPPOSE THE CHRISTIAN FAITH ARE EXPECTED TO PRACTICE RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE. 

MOZILLA WAS EXPECTED TO BE TOLERANT OF THE RELIGIOUS CONVICTIONS OF THEIR CEO, MR. EICH. 




THERE IS NO FREEDOM FROM RELIGION, OUR FEDERAL SUPREME COURT DID NOT FIND A FREEDOM FROM RELIGION. RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE IS EXPECTED FROM THOSE THAT OPPOSE THE CHRISTIAN VIEWS~


"YOU ARE NOT A LIBERTARIAN UNTIL YOU SUPPORT THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF THOSE THAT YOU DESPISE." 



CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS YOUTUBE CHANNEL PLAYLISTS AND VIDEOS COVER TOPICS RANGING FROM: 

Playlists And Videos Of Christian Bible Children's Videos, Cartoons / Claymation / Puppet videos,  Christian guitar, Christian Band, Christian Music, Latin and Spanish Guitar, Christian Band Rejoice, Playlists of Bible Prophecy, End Time Events, Natural Disasters Book Of Revelations, Water Turned To Blood Rev 16:4, Political, Bible Videos, Favorites,  Playlists With Clean Movies, Documentaries, How To Videos.prophecy

MY CIVIL LIBERTIES VIOLATED AGAIN, CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS 12 23 2013

http://youtu.be/I4eZIAC71Zg

click this link to see video

UPDATE ON CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS MY STORY THIS CHRISTMAS EVE, 12 24 2013

UPDATE ON CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS MY STORY THIS CHRISTMAS EVE, 12 24 2013

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSfwjdny4KY&list=PLRxsMy-rzJoXdQpluYCJGjTjIIHcmEymy&index=1

http://youtu.be/bSfwjdny4KY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnLq5hJUQCY&list=PLRxsMy-rzJoXdQpluYCJGjTjIIHcmEymy
ANTI CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION,AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, DISCLOSURE LAWS, DISABILITY RIGHTS LAWS 
VICTIMS RIGHTS 
LEGISLATION, 
DISCLOSURE 
LAW, 
STIGMATIZING 
THE VICTIM AND 
DISCREDITING 
ME THE VICTIM 
FOR COURT, 
TAMERING WITH 
ME THE 
WITNESS!

OFFICERS AND 
INFORMANTS CAN NOT 
CUT RECORDERS OFF AND 
START OVER AGAIN 
RECORDING, TO 
REMOVE INFORMATION 
FROM A RECORDING.
THIS IS DEFRAUDING
THE STATE AND 
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

OFFICERS AND INFORMANTS CAN
NOT TAP ON THEIR WIRE 
TAPS, OR MAKE 
NOISE IN THE BACKGROUND,
TO USE THE 
EXCUSE TO EDIT 
THE RECORDING, SAYING 
THAT PART OF THE TAPE 
WAS DAMAGED. OBSTRUCTION OF 
JUSTICE AND DEFRAUDING THE STATE.

ANTI CHRISTIAN 
RELIGIOUS 
DISCRIMINATION
, VIOLATING MY 
CIVIL RIGHTS 
UNDER THE 
PROTECTED 
CLASS OF 
RELIGION

BREAKING TN WIRE 
TAPPING LAWS, 
TELLING INFORMANTS, 
AND PUTTING ON 
INFORMANT DATA 
BASES PERSONAL 
INFORMATION ILLEGAL 
TO DISCLOSE. USING 
THOSE WITHOUT 
LEGAL "CLEARANCE."

POLITICAL TAKE 
DOWNS USING ARE 
ABUSE OF A PUBLIC 
OFFICE, USING 
INFORMANTS THAT 
OPPOSE ONE'S 
RELIGIOUS AND 
POLITICAL BELIEFS 
A CONFLICT OF 
INTEREST.

COMING INTO OUR 
JOBS RECRUITING 
EMPLOYEES AND 
INFORMANTS 
AGAINST US, 
SPREADING LIES TO 
ALL INVOLVED 
ABOUT US, MORE 
ABUSE OF A PUBLIC 
OFFICE, AND 
DISCRIMINATION.

SPREAD LIES ABOUT 
US, AND STALKING 
US WITH 
INFORMANTS IN 
OUR CHURCHES AND 
OUR OWN 
MINISTRIES 
VIOLATED SEP OF 
CHURCH AND STATE, 
ABUSE OF A PUBLIC 
OFFICE.

STIRRING UP 
INFORMANTS AND 
THOSE IN EVERY 
BUSINESS IN TOWN, 
AGAINST OUR 
POLITICAL AND 
RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, 
IS COERCION, AND 
SEPARATION OF 
CHURCH AND 
STATE!

RUNNING A SMEAR 
CAMPAIGN OF LIES 
AGAINST THOSE 
THEY HATED DUE 
TO POLITICAL AND 
RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, 
USING A 
GOVERNMENT 
POSITION, IS ABUSE 
OF A PUBLIC 
OFFICE.

IT IS ILLEGAL FOR LAW 
ENFORCEMENT, 
INFORMANTS, OR 
EMPLOYEES IN A 
PRIVATE BUSINESS TO 
DISCRIMINATE 
AGAINST THE 
DISABLED, OR 
DISCLOSE 
ACCUSATIONS OF A 
DISABILITY OR ILLNESS, OR TO 
DISCUSS SYMPTOMS.

USING A DISABILITY OF 
PHYSICAL ILLNESS TO 
MOCK OR HUMILIATE 
SOMEONE IS A HATE 
CRIME. AS WELL AS 
MAKING ONE APPEAR 
TO BE A NEGATIVE 
STEREOTYPE DUE TO 
DISABILITY OR 
RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.

TRYING TO MAKE A 
RELIGIOUS GROUP APPEAR 
TO BE A FRINGE GROUP IS 
ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATION, 
VIOLATES SEP OF 
CHURCH AND STATE, 
STATE CAN NOT 
CONDEMN A RELIGIOUS 
BELIEF.